OLS Winter 26 Agenda: Pre-Summit
HSBC Innovation Banking, in collaboration with The Drawdown, will be hosting a padel tournament on Wednesday, 11th November, from 14:00 to 16:00. Players of all levels are welcome, and post-match refreshments will be provided.
Shuttles will run from the hotel to the padel courts. Spaces are limited so if you’d like to take part, please register your interest by emailing katherine.walker@realdealsmedia.com by Friday 9th October.
OLS Winter 26 Agenda: Day 1
Jon Whiteaker, Editor, The Drawdown
- Geopolitical volatility, tariffs and inflation - What does this mean for private markets and operating heads and where should you focus your attention?
- Rising tension and shrinking cross-border capital flows - Where does that leave you if your next raise depends on international LPs?
- Exit windows are being propped open by refinancing and extensions, not by conditions improving. How long can that really hold?
- Could the geopolitical picture get worse before it gets better? How to maintain the course in a world that is constantly shifting around you?
- What's the realistic playbook for a fund trying to break out of the size it's known for?
- Which third-party technology and partners genuinely help you scale, rather than just adding cost?
- When do you resource with people versus resource with technology?
- Hitting liquidity gaps between fund cycles - How is fund financing and structuring being used deliberately as a growth lever, rather than - just a stopgap to bridge the wait?
- What strategies can CFOs and COOs undertake to institutionalise and ensure a GP is more attractive to LPs?
Speakers:
Jonathan Hewitson, CFO, Atomico
SEI Investments, TBC
- AIFMD II reporting duties land in 2027 - How to ensure your disclosure and delegation paperwork is ready
- SFDR is being rebuilt from the ground up - What does moving away from Articles 8 and 9 mean for how you classify your fund?
- The Bank of England is stress-testing the entire private markets system this year - Why does that make your sector a systemic risk - rather than a side issue?
- A cyber incident or vendor outage is now a formal regulatory reporting event under new UK and EU rules - What you need to know about what you're obligated to report, and when?
- Finance function AI adoption has jumped from roughly a third to the vast majority of firms in twelve months. What's different about the operating model now, versus simply "using AI"?
- Every process from reporting to modelling can technically be touched by AI. Which ones are genuinely worth rebuilding, and which are a waste of your time?
- Workflow first, tools second - or the other way round? How are the most advanced operators sequencing this?
- Where does the human stay the gatekeeper, and where should they get out of the way completely?
- A year on from "should we use AI", what does a fund's operating model look like once it's been rebuilt around it?
Speakers:
Moderator: Shuli Levy, Former CFO/COO, Expedition Growth
Three funds get 10 minutes each to make the case for their AI build - a real implementation with the receipts. You Pick the Winner
- What does AI implementation actually look like at a £200m fund versus a £1bn fund, and what does each get for its money?
- Which process did they switch to AI first, and how did they decide?
- What broke, what needed rebuilding, and what would they do differently with hindsight?
- The audience votes for the winner, judged on real return; hours saved, cost avoided, reporting quality, not the best slide deck.
Moderator
Debojit Mukherjee, COO, Agilitas
Speakers
Diana Meyel, Managing Partner, Cipio Partners
Ellen Nyhus, CEO, Elevate
RT1: AI and the Next Generation: Are You Training Juniors or Replacing Them?
| RT2: The Cost of AI: How Are Funds Tracking Token Usage and the ROI?
| RT3: Who Owns Your AI Risk? Model Dependency and Data Sovereignty
| RT4: AI Build vs Buy: Now You Can Build Almost Anything, So What Should You Actually Build? Hosted by Richie Barter, Commercial Director, Rational Partners
| RT5: AI Governance at Scale: What Worked as a Pilot Won't Work as Policy
|
- The median fund now takes 20+ months to close: Is that GPs losing leverage, or LPs simply able to make them wait longer than they used to?
- Side letters and reporting demands are getting more bespoke and more demanding; genuine LP leverage, or GPs just not pushing back?
- When a fund is oversubscribed, does the balance of power actually reverse, and what does that look like in the room, not just on paper?
- If distributions stay slow and LP terms keep tightening, is the industry's alignment model actually holding, or being quietly renegotiated?
- NAV financing, GP stakes, continuation vehicles - Which of these are now core infrastructure, and which are still a solution looking for a problem?
- Provider concentration is quietly becoming a real risk - How many financing relationships should a fund have?
- With the median time to close a fund now stretching past 20 months, how are GPs using financing tools to bridge the gap?
- What separates a fund using these tools strategically from one using them to paper over a weak fundraise?
Speakers:
Keith Bratton, Finance Director, Keyhaven Capital Partners
RT1: Continuation Vehicles: Real Alignment, or Just a Way to Keep the Trophy Assets?
| RT2: NAV Financing: What It Really Costs, and How Lenders Actually Value Your Portfolio
| RT3: End of Life Funds: What Do You Do When Your Fund Has Nothing Left to Sell?
| RT4: GP Stakes, GP Commit and Retail Money: Where Is Your Next Pound Coming From?
| RT5: Beyond DPI: Which Performance Metrics Actually Matter Now?
|
OLS Winter 26 Agenda: Day2
Jon Whiteaker, Editor, The Drawdown
- In-house or outsourced - What's the real cost-benefit, not the sales pitch?
- Proposition must prove that keeping anything in-house beyond your genuine USP is just cost, ego or inertia and does not deliver as - much cost-benefit vs outsourcing key functions.
- Opposition must prove that control of data, responsiveness and institutional knowledge are worth paying for, even when a provider could technically do it cheaper
- When AI can already do a growing share of the process work, does that make the CFO/COO worth more to the business, or less?
- If AI is commoditising the process side of the role, what's left that's genuinely irreplaceable, and are you building your value around it?
- How do you get a genuine seat at the table on investment decisions, not just financial ones, when the "safe" version of the role is - shrinking?
- Will your own role looks the same in five years, and if not, what does it need to become to stay a value driver rather than a cost line?
Speakers:
Diana Meyel, Managing Partner & COO, Cipio Partners
Masterclass 1: How Do You Really Compare? The Data on Pay, Movement and Demand
| Masterclass 2 - Cybersecurity in Plain English: What You Need to Know
| Masterclass 3: Handing Over the Keys: What Really Happens When a CFO or COO Leaves and How Should You Succession Plan?
|
In the weeks before the event, The Drawdown will collect anonymised survey answers from a short set of questions on the topics dominating this year's agenda; AI budgets, fundraising timelines, headcount plans, where confidence is highest and where it's thinnest. Nothing is attributed to a firm or an individual. The results are revealed live on stage, and a panel reacts to them in real time rather than presenting rehearsed views. No shop-windowing or polished house lines, just an honest, live read on where the market actually stands, benchmarked directly against the room you're sitting in.
Boardroom 1 - The Next-Gen Table: What Retention Really Costs You
| Boardroom 2 - How Many Providers Are Too Many? A Concentration Risk Reality Check
| Boardroom 3 - The Valuations Checklist Nobody Actually Gives You
|
